Logo Envrionment

As a manufacturer and supplier of plastic packaging, we are very aware of our responsibility when it comes to sustainability and environmental protection. We are constantly looking for sustainable alternatives to conventional plastic film.

Bioplastics and biofilms are attracting more and more public interest. In recent years, a young and innovative industry has established itself, which is researching to solve the problem of the scarce raw materials. In the meantime, many well-known companies from retail and sales have also become aware of this trend. They are trying to take account of the growing ecological awareness of many people. However, the question arises as to whether everything that says organic is really organic inside. So let's take a look at the allegedly biological alternatives to conventional plastic film mentioned below and clear up a few existing myths on the subject.

The term biofilm can basically be divided into three categories.

  • Oxo-based films

  • With these films, a conventional, crude oil-based plastic is mixed with metal salts, which is said to cause the oxo-degradable plastics to completely decompose in the compost. However, this is not true, since the smallest particles, the so-called microplastics, remain. It would therefore be extremely harmful to the environment to dispose of these films in the compost. In any case, you should inform yourself about the actual composition of the films if the compostability of this film is advertised. There is now a strict ban on oxo-degradable plastics in the EU, so it is better not to use these films.
  • Bio-based films

  • Bio-based (bio-based) plastic films are another supposedly biological alternative. You should also take a close look here: bio-based in this context only means that a certain proportion of the ethylene used to manufacture the films comes from renewable raw materials. Starch, sugar and cellulose base from sugar cane are used for this. The rest is regular ethylene derived from crude oil. The percentage composition is also not clearly defined. A proportion of just 20% ethylene from renewable raw materials is sufficient to declare the film as bio-based. Bio-based films are not biodegradable and must not be disposed of as biowaste.
    It should also be mentioned that the regenerated material from renewable raw materials obtained during recycling is of significantly poorer quality. This means that the higher the proportion of bio-ethylene, the more material is required to recycle the film. With up to seven possible recycling cycles, this has a very high impact on energy and resource consumption. The suitability for food and the good mechanical properties should not go unmentioned as positive properties.
  • Completely biological foils

  • The last alternative are the completely biological foils. Is that the solution for the future?
    These consist of 100% renewable raw materials and are e.g. B. from wheat, potato or corn starch. They can be disposed of as organic waste or as garden compost. Microbiological degradation at temperatures above 60 °C within 6 months to 90% of the mass in carbon dioxide. The films are milky transparent to an opaque appearance. But even this promising approach has its problems. The quality, e.g. B. The tear strength of these biofilms is not good to use them efficiently as shrink films for packaging. Very large areas with monocultures are required for the cultivation of raw materials such as potatoes or corn, which are anything but ecological if you take into account the variety of species or biodiversity. These films are food-safe and are mainly offered as "short-life packaging" for packaging with a short life cycle.

Biofoils in use

From our point of view, none of the alternatives available so far are of high quality and sustainable enough to be able to completely do without the classic plastics. Furthermore, large-scale deforestation of rainforest areas is not a solution for the cultivation of monocultures.

Our own product rLDPE is the best alternative to biofilms. Guaranteed production from sorted production waste for multiple reuse. Responsible disposal makes rLDPE an environmentally friendly alternative to biofilm.

Product overview

Currently available stock :

Mat.ALArticleLTEXTStock#Lot/UnitTWideLengthStrenght
ALU Flat Bags Three-edge seal bags made of aluminum composite film 10.01348 St. 9201.750100µ
MDPEFlat Bags natural transparent - without additives - S.welding - 10.010490 St. 7001.40075µ
MDPEFlat Bag with side gred colored - with antistatic agent - without lubricant - withhot stamping - with 100 mm inserted side fold - with double bottom welding - 10.0154.700 St. 550690100µ
MDPEFlat Bag with side gfluorescent orange dyed - with antistatic agent - without lubricant and slip - with hot stamping - with 150 mm inserted side fold - 10.0162.500 St. 700690100µ
LDPECover disk Round foil blanks (lid discs) - diameter 240 mm - needled - 10.0184.300 St. 280280100µ
LDPEFlat Films/Foils trinatural transparent - straight edges and neatly trimmed - without slip - 400 linear meters/roll - wound on a cardboard tube with a 76 mm core - 10.019310 Ro. 50070µ
LDPEFlat Bags natural transparent - with slip - 1 side, 1 color "BLUE" printed, bottom edge of print 30 mm above weld seam - 77.7399.875 St. 180410100µ
LDPEFlat Bags natural transparent - with lubricant - S. welding - 1A product - 10.0127.500 St. 235280180µ
LDPEFlat Bags 77.504700 St. 240400100µ
LDPEFlat Bags natural transparent - with antistatic agent - specific surface resistance less than or equal to 10 to the power of 11 square Ohm - 77.093150 St. 1.0001.60090µ
LDPEFlat Bags natural transparent - without slip - S.welding - 50 pieces in a small box - 74.882300 St. 1.0001.80080µ
LDPEFolded Films on rollNatural - with antistatic agent according to TRGS 727 - fire protection film - flame-retardant according to DIN 4102 - CAT B1 - 30 meters on the roll - cardboard tube 76 mm core 76.0015 Ro. 3.6000160µ
LDPEFolded Films on rollnatural transparent - 4000/2000 mm - 50 running meters per roll - wound on a core with a 76 mm cardboard core - roll weight approximately 28 kg - 76.7692 Ro. 4.0000150µ
LDPEFilm Cuts natural transparent - needled - 10.01735.400 St. 280280100µ
LDPETubes Natural transparent - no additives - 150 linear meters/roll - wound on a cardboard tube with a 76 mm core - roll weight approximately 3 kg 77.06428 Ro. 500200µ
LDPETubes 77.9427 Ro. 4000150µ
LDPETubes natural transparent - without lubricant - 100 meters on the roll - cardboard tube with roll core 76 mm - roll weight approx. 33 kg - 1.3461 Ro. 1.7500100µ
LDPEBox Hoods 76.868200 St. 600640100µ
LDPERoundliner natural transparent - with lubricant - diameter 320 mm - height 600 mm - 76.5091.750 St. 51563050µ
LDPEFlat Bag with side ggrey transparent coloured - with 240 mm inserted side fold - with S.welding - 1.2421.000 St. 9601.000100µ
LDPEFlat Bag with side gblue transparent dyed - with 280 mm inserted side fold - With S.welding - 1.239890 St. 1.1401.200100µ
LDPEFlat Bag with side gyellow transparent dyed - with 280 mm inserted side fold - With S.welding - 1.2401.080 St. 1.1401.200100µ
LDPEFlat Bag with side gNatural transparent - with antistatic agent - with 275 mm inserted side fold - Specific surface resistance 10 to the power of 10 Square O76.784550 St. 1.3001.00090µ
LDPEFlat Bags black colored - conductive - specific surface resistance less than or equal to 10 to the power of 7 square Ohm 77.3401.910 St. 8101.050200µ
VFO Flat Film/Tubes on rComposite film inside black outside white - wound on rolls of 500 m - cardboard tubes with 76 mm core diameter - 10.0143 Ro. 6000110µ